BEPUphysics

As 1.4.0 include now this feature, how it is suppose to be use ? Is there any new demo of it ? Does this mean the gravity is applied to anything near the entity (quite like the forcefield in planet demo) or something else ? As entity's gravity is defined as a vector, first we need to create the vect...

Doh !! I know it was something obvious thanks for the reply and tips, CompoundShape looks a lot more easy as playing with offsets.

Hi, willing to make kind of "ball in a maze" game, instead of using constraint (as explained in another thread) to force the ball to stay on the plane (with here plane = a wide and flat BEPU box), I cheat a little by adding a second plane on top of the first, a bit higher than the ball dia...

Thanks for the reply. Regarding the code, I just forgot those two examples, thanks to remind me, they're are basic enough to get some interesting and helpful inputs. Anyway, stripping down the demo was quite a good start for me as I have to understand a thing or two. And as you say (despite I don't ...

Hi, do you have any interest in adding air in BEPU for various airships (from gliders to jet planes, including turboprop/piston engine powered planes as well as choppers, balloons and parachutes) ? If not, would you like to provide some inputs to the best way of adding such "component" ? I...

This is not because all other physics engine are complicated, undocumented, etc that you have to follow the same way you know. I see a bunch of physics engines/libraries, most of the free ones are now dead/discontinued, like Jitter or Farseer for example, and just a few has been actually used in a r...

Hi Norbo, I new to games development with C#/XNA and BEPU appears to be one of the best physics engine available but there is one point I think which could be seriously improved: documentation . I means, the so called " tutorial " is everything but a tutorial and it doesn't work as-is ! (w...