BEPUphysics

Something like this would work:
viewtopic.php?t=2539

I guess I should submit a bug report with a clean project and then do a forum post and hope for the best.

I don't envy whoever tries to tackle that report- v2 does enough unusual stuff that it's practically a fuzz test. Best of luck!

Went ahead and added one: https://github.com/bepu/bepuphysics2/blob/master/Demos/Demos/SimpleSelfContainedDemo.cs The other demos are generally pretty isolated from the surrounding framework too. The Initialize function does all the physicsy stuff for the most part, the Demo.Update calls Simulation....

and that means changing all operators by functions. That is a lot of work, I don't know if there is a sane way of doing it. I hold out hope that one day in the not too distant future, either RyuJIT (or an alternate AOT compiler backend under CoreRT) will be able to collapse operators into the same ...

One question though, what is the difference between a mesh and a convex hull in bepu/physics? I've been using them as synonyms, but reading your answer makes me think I have the wrong concept in my head. Meshes are an arbitrary collection of triangles. They can represent any surface , including con...

If by 'disable' you mean it is not interact with physics at all- no motion, no collisions, no constraints- then actually removing it is the best way. If you instead mean 'does not respond to forces', then making the object kinematic would work. Kinematic objects have effectively infinite mass- they'...

I've been intending to update it, just haven't got around to it. I suppose I can update it more than once every 5 months :P I'm waiting for convex hulls, mesh-mesh detection and some samples of a character controller (I just noticed there's one already) to move to V2. Incidentally... convex hulls ar...

Yikes, I think this bug dates back to the last time I refactored island merging to occur on constraint add, and if I'm right, it's an ugly one: 1) Dynamic-Sensor pair is found by the broad phase, but both objects are inactive. The pair's 'updated' flag is left unset. 2) Kinematic-dynamic pair is fou...

Replicated- that's pretty weird! The pairs do indeed get removed due to 'staleness' a frame after activation, only to be readded another frame later. I probably reordered some activation logic in the narrowphase without realizing a dependency eons ago. Until I fix it, a workaround is to set the sens...

The pairs list is updated upon the addition of a CollidablePairHandler to the narrow phase , and upon pair handler cleanup . The pair handler should persist (i.e. not get cleaned up) for the duration of the broadphase detected overlap regardless of activity state, so I don't have a good explanation ...

That error does indeed look like something I'd expect from asynchronous modification. If it is, I won't be able to easily point out the problem. If you fully sequentialize execution to guarantee no asynchronous access of any kind, does it still happen? Edit: Oh yeah and I´m running on .net core 2.1 ...

The v2 demos now contain a basic character controller system and a demo with a giant newt to run around on.

I'm not sure if anyone has managed it with v2 yet. If you want to try a smaller scale test, you may want to check if the System.Numerics.Vectors types work well yet. It may still be a little tricky- there might be configuration options you'd have to fiddle with to enable the relevant supporting runt...

Looking good 8) What would be the best way to approximate scaling actually? Should I just scale all the forces (gravity, movement, jump) in addition to rescaling the height and radius and mass? Pretty much, although you should be careful about mass. A 'correct' scaling would increase mass by the cub...

One thing that I'm still not quite sure about are the instanced meshes. Is the contact support going to work with these as well and perform reasonably well with a single character? From a performance perspective, the difference between an InstancedMesh and a StaticMesh is near zero, and the charact...